GRE作文ISSUE开头段优质介绍

GRE作文ISSUE开头段优质介绍（精选7篇）

1.GRE作文ISSUE开头段优质介绍 篇一

Issue1

We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.

------正文------

From people whose views we share we get confidence, encouragement, and psychological satisfaction; from people whose views contradict our own we get new angles, fresh perspectives, and pertinent advices. But excessive agreements would lead us to the morass of self-complacence; and extreme contradictions would weaken our determination of learning. Thus we should fully recognize the potential danger of limiting our vision in one of the two sides. And only through the approach of paying equal attention to both sides could we make further achievements in the process of learning.

Views and ideas from people agree with us may raise our confidence, strengthen our courage, and enhance our psychological satisfaction. According to common sense and our everyday experience, the propensity to accept the ideas from people who agree with us rather than the opinions from people disagree with us associates strongly with the nature of human beings, for we are social animals and it is the inner instinct of us to seek for approval of others. Imagine, what would you react if the work accomplished by your arduous efforts receives fierce criticism or not even a glance? You would lose your strength to march in the long road of learning. On the contrary, agreements may cause the feeling of being accepted and consented, thus we gain the psychological satisfaction which will impulse us to learn more. Moreover, customarily, we tend to imitate and share ideas and behaviors from our parents, friends, classmates and so forth, who are in the same group of ours. By this way we form knowledge of our own.

Not under all circumstances we can learn from people whose views we share. Only base on the premises that all the views of our assenters are authentic and sincere, however, could we learn useful knowledge from them. On condition that people consent and even flatter us for certain purposes which have nothing to do with learning, our learning would be hindered instead of motivated. We would be possessed in the illusive pride and limited in a narrow bound of vision. Consequently, we can see that the speaker’s assertion is incomplete and oversimplified. Contradicting views and ideas could aware us of the mistakes and flaws in our work which we can not discover by ourselves, bring us fresh angles and perspectives, and then make our work mature and complete. Thereby through the discussion and competition both we and the people disagree with us could make advancements in our learning. Debate on the same subject make it possible for human beings to make most of the achievements and advances on fields of science, technology, philosophy and the like. If we see only on the one side of the coin, we could get only a partial and distorted knowledge and view which might mislead our learning.

Also, contradiction may cause negative effects under certain conditions, especially when the debate becomes irrational denouncement or personal attack. Then our confidence would be impaired by the criticisms and our learning inhibited by the stress excessive contradictions brings us. Disagreements would be detrimental rather than beneficial to our learning under this circumstance. Bias on each of the two sides is detrimental to our learning for that agreements and disagreements form a organic entity which can not be absolutely divided. Over reliance on one side is blind and unwise. Agreements base on no evidence are actually flatters; disagreements without rational reasons are reprimands. We would be enmeshed in the web of self-contention sewed by ourselves and could not go ahead if we and blinded by the flatters; we would be frozen in the chilly night of darkness created by reprimands and became helpless and hopeless. We must pay equal attentions on both sides to see the whole picture.

To sum up, ideas of people whose views we share and people whose views contradict our own play their respective role in our learning, and none of them should be neglected. Therefore, balance between both sides is needed. And only through this way could we achieve the further goal in our process of learning.

2.GRE作文ISSUE开头段优质介绍 篇二

新GRE Issue作文复习侧重点：列提纲

新GRE Issue备考侧重点：准备提纲

新GRE Issue要求考生根据所给的题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。Issue题库涉及社会、文化、科技、历史、政治、艺术等诸多方面。不同类型的题目有较大差别，但在同一类型的题目中却包含了许多命题方向非常接近的题目。

Issue写作对于论据的要求是非常高的，因此你的名人事例的储备，相关知识量的积累是非常重要的。这一环节也正是GRE考生最为头疼的一部分，举不出支持自己的观点的例子，因此让自己的文章显得只有苍白的论证，缺乏说服力。因此要多读历史，积累例子，尤其关注那些重要的哲学家、科学家、艺术家、政治领袖等人的生平事迹、主要贡献。例如Issue里的这样一道真题：“Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists are always out of step with their time and their society。”(真正影响深远的思想家和具有高度创造力的艺术家总是与他们的时代和社会步伐不一致)。这个题目如果没有必备的那些思想家和艺术家的例子，文章必然缺乏说服力。因此读历史积累写作素材，具体说就是论据素材是拿高分的一个重要环节。

3.GRE写作提纲Issue完整版 篇三

观点：中立

1、正：a、当下问题是急迫需求;b、当下问题解决，未来问题解决;c、反之当下问题不解决，未来问题解决可能无从谈起

2、反：a、政府目光应该长远;b、有时需要牺牲部分利益;c、当下问题艰难，无法立即解决，当作长远工作

3、交汇：并没有看起来那么矛盾a、同时关注于两个问题;b、根据不同问题投入不同精力，如温饱问题(subsistence problem)非常急迫必须解决;c、某些事关国家前途的未来尖端问题应尽力解决

4.GRE写作提纲Issue完整版 篇四

观点：偏否定

1、随着教育不断发展，教育机构具有越来越全面的手段去培养一个学生。有一个正在时兴的观点是教育机构有责任劝阻学生学习他们不太可能成功的领域。

2、我们必须承认这一观点有一定意义：a、通过劝阻学生，可以使学生避免在自己弱势的领域耗费精力;b、进一步说，由于教育机构要培养对于社会有用的人才，这样的劝阻有助于学生在擅长的领域发挥才智(talent)

3、a、然而，这样的推论(inference)存在巨大的漏洞(flaws)b、首先，尽管教育学(pedagogy)、心理学(psychology)和其它学科在不断发展，教育机构对于学生能否成功的判断仍然无法保证准确(Thomas Alva Edison、Albert Einstein);c、进一步说，对学生的劝阻可能不仅不会使学生服从，反而产生抵触心理，在看上去(seemingly)会成功的领域表现消极;d、在基础教育阶段，学生有全面学习的权利(right)，而在高等教育阶段，学生有自由选择专业的权利。这两种权利皆为受教育权的一部分，教育机构无权剥夺。

5.GRE作文ISSUE开头段优质介绍 篇五

有些人认为政府对艺术的资助是有必要的，资助能够保证艺术繁荣发展，并且让所有人享受艺术。也有人认为政府对艺术的资助会威胁到艺术的完整性。

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

6.GRE作文ISSUE开头段优质介绍 篇六

首先纠正一些错误的观念，不是必须狂看英文资料，也不是必须总是引用Aristotle之类的(有可能被当作cliche)。能想到什么用什么，自己的例子也好，别人的也好，有没有名气无所谓。

我在写之前都会画一个图，提醒自己全面思考的几个要素：溯源与分析后果，定性与定量，方面与程度，以及必要的限定。这几个词我认为很精髓的概括了多数的方向。

拿到题目，首先不要慌，拿起笔，大脑想到什么就写什么(一般是中文吧)，关键是绝对不放过闪过脑海的任何一个思路，这样30秒之内你就知道自己内心的真实看法了，而且草稿纸上也会乱七八糟的写出一堆tip。这样还会愁素材吗？All you have to do is to organize 那就解释一下七个关键字吧。

溯源：分析statement的来源，为什么会有这种想法，讨论之前先要定义或re定义哪些概念，statement中隐含的默认条件(assumption)，一系列前statement的东西分析后果：statement的指导意义，实际情况，等等，这个不用多说了吧必要的界定：issue的题目内涵之complexity是人所共知的，不是说随随便便就能一边倒的论证某个position，有时候不能universally apply的东西要自己注意并且在文章里指出来，否则写到一半会晕死的。

方面与程度：考虑从哪一个方面进行分析，方面的划分是conclusive还是not，要都想好。程度就是不可能舒舒服服的一个position写到死没法refute的地步，要考虑自己论述的coherent，不能写到一半自己把自己驳倒了，那还怎么接着写啊(心里边发毛的典例) 定性与定量只不过是一个说法罢了，方面就是定型，程度就是定量。当然，构思和写的.过程中这两点一直都有指导意义，所以单独提出来。

主要是为了方便全面思考，要有话说，而且要说得有理。一直注意这七点有帮助。

当然这是我为自己design的方法，别人的话要自己考虑考虑之后再本土化咯。还有那个想到什么写什么的tip，不知道是不是和“大脑风暴”不谋而合。想得太多而不落实往往会搞得很心虚。写下来就知道自己到底是怎么认为的。

7.GRE作文ISSUE开头段优质介绍 篇七

大学生应该选择那些就业前景好的研究领域。

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.